Sad News:BBC Pundit have Criticize and appeal for the BANNING of World Snooker as …

Snooker aficionado and BBC commentator Neil Robertson emphasized the urgency of revising the sport’s rulebook after witnessing Jak Jones struggle during his World Championship semi-final match against Stuart Bingham. Jones incurred 49

 

 

 

penalty points in one frame due to repeatedly failing to hit a specific red ball while snookered behind the green, prompting Robertson, among others, to advocate for rule changes.

 

Jones aimed to play off a particular red beside the pink spot but needed to do so at a precise angle to avoid leaving Bingham with an easy potting opportunity. Despite numerous attempts, Jones was unsuccessful until the ninth try, ultimately losing the frame.

 

A similar situation unfolded in the evening session between Kyren Wilson and David Gilbert, leading Robertson to assert that the current rules require scrutiny.

 

Robertson highlighted the strategic aspect of the game, where players intentionally miss shots to gradually improve their position and ensure safety. He echoed fellow commentator Shaun Murphy’s sentiment that the rules should be revisited, suggesting that players should not be allowed to snooker behind the ball they have nominated.

 

Steve Davis, another BBC pundit and six-time world champion, concurred with Robertson’s call for rule adjustments. He proposed penalties for players who fail to hit a nominated ball within a certain timeframe or increase the penalty points. Davis also suggested prohibiting players from snookering behind the nominated ball, which would prevent prolonged periods of players missing shots.

 

The consensus among Robertson, Davis, and others is that the current rules incentivize defensive play at the expense of the game’s entertainment value. By revising the rulebook, snooker authorities could address these concerns and ensure a fairer and more engaging competition for players and fans alike.

 

 

 

Get related article>>>>https://kvibezsport.co.uk/?p=13788&preview=true

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *